|
THE DRUNKEN WOMAN WHO DROWNED CASE
The Claim:
A drunk woman's estate received $1 million after she entered
a closed city park and drowned in three feet of water.
The Truth:
Sure sounds outrageous. It's unfortunate that "reformers"
who cite this case neglect to mention that the state appellate
court reversed the decision.
On July 21, 1985, a group of seven people, including 32-year-old
plaintiff Ana Garcia, squeezed through a hole in a fence at approximately
1 a.m. to get into a municipal pool in the Bronx. The lights were
off and no lifeguards were on duty. Ms. Garcia, who had been drinking
and whose blood-alcohol level was later measured at 0.23 percent
(twice the legal limit), stepped into the shallow water, fell
beneath its surface and drowned.
At trial, the woman's family won a $2 million negligence suit
against New York City, even though the jury agreed that the woman
herself was partly negligent for breaking into the pool and trying
to swim while intoxicated. The award was later reduced to approximately
$615,000.
In October 1994, the Appellate Division of the State Supreme
Court threw out the entire award, stating that the woman assumed
the risk of her actions and thus was solely responsible for her
own death. The five-judge panel found that her "reckless
and culpable" conduct was an unforeseeable superseding event
which absolved the city from any liability. The city, the court
added, took all reasonably necessary steps to secure the area
and was not negligent for failing to keep trespassers out of the
pool or a lifeguard on duty after the park was officially closed
for the evening.
Cites: Garcia v. City of New York, 205 A.D.2d 49 (N.Y.
App. Div. 1994); "Drowning Suit Award Reversed," The
New York Times, Oct. 21, 1994, at B3; "Appellate Division
Dismisses $2 Million Verdict in Drowning," New York Law Journal,
Oct. 21, 1994, at 1.
|